Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom (2018)

4 Responses

  1. Jon-Luc says:

    Good review Vince, interesting information and analysis.

    For a franchise that’s existed for as long as it has, and with as many movies as there have been, the only entries I can say that I truly enjoy are the original and to a lesser extent Jurassic World, but I wasn’t crazy about the latter, and the sequels are a step down from it. Similar to what you mentioned in the podcast episode on this, I find the new characters uninteresting. I like the actors, but their roles to me are too generic and thinly written, the same goes for the plot. Without the same excitement generated by even the previous movie, there’s just not enough substance here to justify yet another sequel from a creative standpoint (though from a financial standpoint it’s certainly justified). Watching Jurassic Park for the upteenth time is still more fun than watching any of the sequels.

    • Vincent Leo says:

      Regurgitating what I said in the podcast episodes, it’s the park where the fun ideas are. The characters aren’t very deep to hold our interest on their own, and the concept of dinos running amok outside of the park isn’t sustainable except to just ramp up the spectacle and stunts to absurd levels, a la the Fast and Furious franchise. The more they stick to the science premise, as the first film did, the better, and I like how the theme park premise seems to comment on the movies themselves, which is why I liked Park I and World I. The others are the same old monster movies we’ve seen before with better CG. The new characters they’ve introduced to make spin-offs in Dominion are pretty lame, and I’m very much not looking forward to seeing what happens with the franchise after this because there’s nowhere interesting to go after you get out of the park.

    • Vincent Leo says:

      Jon-Luc: I should probably ask since you’ve just seen it and probably have better attention to detail than I seem to muster sometimes: did you understand why they were making such a big deal about the dinosaurs dying on Isla Nublar? Ian Malcolm and others make it seem like the volcano is going to wipe out the dinosaurs from existence again, but I’m curious how that would have affected the many more dinosaurs that exist on Isla Sorna, including the ones that can fly around. I am certain that the same question must have occurred to the makers of the movie – did I miss it, or did they just ignore it because they thought we wouldn’t notice or care? If it was just a simple oversight, that would be the worst excuse – it’s a colossal hole in the story.

      • Jon-Luc says:

        You know Vince, I’ve been thinking about that, and even researching it, and I believe it really is just a plot hole. It doesn’t make sense. Very poor writing. Minus a half star for that!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *